2026-10-28T00:49:28Zhttps://kostu-rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/oai/request

oai:kostu-rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net:kostu/102072026-10-27T23:53:11Zopenairecom_kostu_10000col_kostu_10001com_kostu_10007col_kostu_10060

A Comparison of Grammatical Error Correction Models in English Writing; [Ingilizce Yaziminda Dil Bilgisel Hata Duzeltme Modellerinin Karsilastinlmasi]Eker, KadirPehlivanoglu, Meltem KurtEker, Ayse GulSyakura, Muhammad AbdanDuru, NevcihanChatGPTGoogle Bardgrammatical error correctionlanguage modelsT5Grammatical error correction (GEC) is the task of correcting grammatical, spelling, and word usage errors in texts. Detecting and correcting these errors makes it difficult for the reader to understand the text and negatively affects communication. Editors and proofreaders can identify and correct grammatical errors while reading texts. However, this manual correction takes a long time. With the development of technology, artificial intelligence-supported tools have been developed that automatically correct errors. In artificial intelligence-supported systems, this task is usually performed using natural language processing methods. In this study, a traditional neural network architecture (Attention BiLSTM) and a transformer-based language model (T5) were trained. Then, the success of these trained models and Large Language Models (LLMs) (ChatGPT, Google Bard, LanguageTool) in English grammatical error correction has been compared on the JFLEG dataset. According to experimental results, the pre-trained T5 language model beats others in all evaluation metrics for grammatical error correction.Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.2023Conference Objecthttps://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/kostu/10207https://doi.org/10.1109/ubmk59864.2023.10286642979-835034081-5trUBMK 2023 - Proceedings: 8th International Conference on Computer Science and Engineeringinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessinfo:eu-repo/semantics/conferenceObjecthttps://kostu-rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/tr/items/kostu/10207