<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd"><responseDate>2026-10-28T02:56:03Z</responseDate><request verb="GetRecord" identifier="oai:kostu-rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net:kostu/10352" metadataPrefix="oai_dc">https://kostu-rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/oai/request</request><GetRecord><record><header><identifier>oai:kostu-rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net:kostu/10352</identifier><datestamp>2026-10-27T23:53:13Z</datestamp><setSpec>openaire</setSpec><setSpec>driver</setSpec><setSpec>com_kostu_10000</setSpec><setSpec>col_kostu_10001</setSpec><setSpec>com_kostu_10007</setSpec><setSpec>col_kostu_10058</setSpec></header><metadata><oai_dc:dc xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd"><dc:title>Optimizing Miniscrew Stability: A Finite Element Study of Titanium Screw Insertion Angles</dc:title><dc:creator>Akbulut, Yasin</dc:creator><dc:creator>Ozdemir, Serhat</dc:creator><dc:subject>biomechanics</dc:subject><dc:subject>cortical bone stress</dc:subject><dc:subject>finite element analysis</dc:subject><dc:subject>insertion angle</dc:subject><dc:subject>orthodontic miniscrew</dc:subject><dc:subject>primary stability</dc:subject><dc:description>This study aimed to evaluate how different insertion angles of titanium orthodontic miniscrews (30°, 45°, and 90°) influence stress distribution and displacement in surrounding alveolar bone using three-dimensional finite element analysis (FEA), with a focus on biomechanical outcomes at the titanium–bone interface. The 90° insertion angle generated the highest stress in cortical bone (58.2 MPa) but the lowest displacement (0.023 mm), while the 30° angle produced lower stress (36.4 MPa) but greater displacement (0.052 mm). The 45° angle represented a compromise, combining moderate stress (42.7 MPa) and displacement (0.035 mm). This simulation-based study was conducted between January and April 2025 at the Department of Orthodontics, Kocaeli Health and Technology University. A standardized 3D mandibular bone model (2 mm cortical and 13 mm cancellous layers) was constructed, and Ti-6Al-4V miniscrews (1.6 mm × 8 mm) were virtually inserted at 30°, 45°, and 90°. A horizontal orthodontic load of 2 N was applied, and von Mises stress and displacement values were calculated in ANSYS Workbench. Stress patterns were visualized using color-coded maps. The 90° insertion angle generated the highest von Mises stress in cortical bone (50.6 MPa), with a total maximum stress of 58.2 MPa, followed by 45° (42.7 MPa) and 30° (36.4 MPa) insertions (p &lt; 0.001). Stress was predominantly concentrated at the cortical entry point, especially in the 90° model. In terms of displacement, the 90° group exhibited the lowest mean displacement (0.023 ± 0.002 mm), followed by 45° (0.035 ± 0.003 mm) and 30° (0.052 ± 0.004 mm), with statistically significant differences among all groups (p &lt; 0.001). The 45° angle showed a balanced biomechanical profile, combining moderate stress and displacement values, as confirmed by post hoc analysis. From a biomimetics perspective, understanding how insertion angle affects bone response provides insights for designing bio-inspired anchorage systems. By simulating natural stress dissipation, this study demonstrates that insertion angle strongly modulates miniscrew performance. Vertical placement (90°) ensures rigidity but concentrates cortical stress, whereas oblique placement, particularly at 45°, offers a balanced compromise with adequate stability and reduced stress. These results emphasize that beyond material properties, surgical parameters such as insertion angle are critical for clinical success.</dc:description><dc:publisher>Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)</dc:publisher><dc:date>2025</dc:date><dc:type>Article</dc:type><dc:identifier>https://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/kostu/10352</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>https://doi.org/10.3390/biomimetics10100650</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>2313-7673</dc:identifier><dc:language>en</dc:language><dc:relation>Biomimetics</dc:relation><dc:rights>info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess</dc:rights><dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type><dc:identifier>https://kostu-rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/tr/items/kostu/10352</dc:identifier></oai_dc:dc></metadata></record></GetRecord></OAI-PMH>