Impact of guideline-based prompting on the large language model performance in dental trauma management clinical decision-making

MakaleYalnız künyeScopus SJRQ1
  • SDG 3 · Sağlık ve Kaliteli Yaşam

Özet

This study evaluated the impact of guideline-based prompting on the performance of large language models (LLMs) in answering dental trauma–related questions. Sixteen multiple-choice questions (MCQs) and sixteen open-ended questions (OEQs) derived from the International Association of Dental Traumatology (IADT) guidelines were used. ChatGPT-4o, Gemini-2.5 Flash, and DeepSeek v3.2 were tested under two conditions: with and without guideline support. Questions were asked three times daily over three consecutive days using independent chat sessions. In the guideline-based condition, the dental trauma guideline was uploaded and models were instructed to answer according to the document. Responses were evaluated using predefined answer keys and a structured rubric. Statistical analyses were performed using the Shapiro–Wilk test, aligned rank transform (ART) analysis, and Bonferroni-adjusted multiple comparisons. Multiple-choice performance was consistently high across all models, with no significant effects of day, time, or AI model. Guideline-based prompting substantially improved performance and guideline concordance on open-ended questions. In the guideline-supported condition, DeepSeek achieved a median score of 32, while ChatGPT and Gemini achieved median scores of 30. Without guideline support, median scores decreased to 26, 20, and 23, respectively. All models achieved 100% accuracy on MCQs with guideline support, whereas accuracy ranged from 81.2% to 100% without guideline support. Significant differences between AI models were observed for OEQ scores (p < 0.001). Guideline-based prompting improved guideline concordance and overall performance, particularly for open-ended dental trauma questions. These findings support the use of guideline grounding to enhance the guideline concordance and reliability of LLM-generated responses while emphasizing the continued need for clinician oversight.

Anahtar Kelimeler

RDL Kalıcı Bağlantı (PID)
https://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/kostu/10438Resmi atıflarda kullanılan kalıcı adres
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10266-026-01511-3Yayıncı resmi DOI adresi
İndeks kayıtları
Kaydın indeks veri tabanlarındaki sayfası (aktarımda alınan kayıt numarasıyla). Erişim, indeksin kendi koşullarına bağlıdır.
Atıflar
Scopus
0
OpenAlex
0
Her kaynağın kendi saydığı toplam atıf; aktarım ve zenginleştirme sırasında alındı.
Tam Kayıt
AlanDeğerDil
dc.contributor.authorKaşıkçı, Sena
dc.contributor.authorŞirinoğlu, Ebru
dc.contributor.authorÖzdemir, Olcay
dc.date.accessioned2026-10-27T23:47:32.307638808Z
dc.date.available2026-10-27T23:47:32.307638808Z
dc.date.issued2026
dc.description.abstractThis study evaluated the impact of guideline-based prompting on the performance of large language models (LLMs) in answering dental trauma–related questions. Sixteen multiple-choice questions (MCQs) and sixteen open-ended questions (OEQs) derived from the International Association of Dental Traumatology (IADT) guidelines were used. ChatGPT-4o, Gemini-2.5 Flash, and DeepSeek v3.2 were tested under two conditions: with and without guideline support. Questions were asked three times daily over three consecutive days using independent chat sessions. In the guideline-based condition, the dental trauma guideline was uploaded and models were instructed to answer according to the document. Responses were evaluated using predefined answer keys and a structured rubric. Statistical analyses were performed using the Shapiro–Wilk test, aligned rank transform (ART) analysis, and Bonferroni-adjusted multiple comparisons. Multiple-choice performance was consistently high across all models, with no significant effects of day, time, or AI model. Guideline-based prompting substantially improved performance and guideline concordance on open-ended questions. In the guideline-supported condition, DeepSeek achieved a median score of 32, while ChatGPT and Gemini achieved median scores of 30. Without guideline support, median scores decreased to 26, 20, and 23, respectively. All models achieved 100% accuracy on MCQs with guideline support, whereas accuracy ranged from 81.2% to 100% without guideline support. Significant differences between AI models were observed for OEQ scores (p < 0.001). Guideline-based prompting improved guideline concordance and overall performance, particularly for open-ended dental trauma questions. These findings support the use of guideline grounding to enhance the guideline concordance and reliability of LLM-generated responses while emphasizing the continued need for clinician oversight.
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s10266-026-01511-3
dc.identifier.issn1618-1247
dc.identifier.pmid42547726
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-105046486771
dc.identifier.urihttps://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/kostu/10438
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherSpringer
dc.relation.ispartofOdontology
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.subjectArtificial intelligence
dc.subjectDental trauma
dc.subjectGuideline-based prompting
dc.subjectIADT guidelines
dc.subjectLarge language models
dc.titleImpact of guideline-based prompting on the large language model performance in dental trauma management clinical decision-making
dc.typeArticle
rdl.citation.openalex0
rdl.citation.scopus0
rdl.departmentDepartment of Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Kocaeli University, 41190, Kocaeli, Turkey
rdl.departmentDepartment of Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Kocaeli Health and Technology University, 41190, Kocaeli, Turkey
rdl.departmentDepartment of Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Karabük University, 78050, Karabük, Turkey
rdl.oa.statusclosed
rdl.publication.statusinPress
rdl.scopus.quartileQ1
rdl.sdgSDG03
rdl.source.indexSCOPUS
rdl.source.indexPUBMED