Impact of guideline-based prompting on the large language model performance in dental trauma management clinical decision-making
Özet
This study evaluated the impact of guideline-based prompting on the performance of large language models (LLMs) in answering dental trauma–related questions. Sixteen multiple-choice questions (MCQs) and sixteen open-ended questions (OEQs) derived from the International Association of Dental Traumatology (IADT) guidelines were used. ChatGPT-4o, Gemini-2.5 Flash, and DeepSeek v3.2 were tested under two conditions: with and without guideline support. Questions were asked three times daily over three consecutive days using independent chat sessions. In the guideline-based condition, the dental trauma guideline was uploaded and models were instructed to answer according to the document. Responses were evaluated using predefined answer keys and a structured rubric. Statistical analyses were performed using the Shapiro–Wilk test, aligned rank transform (ART) analysis, and Bonferroni-adjusted multiple comparisons. Multiple-choice performance was consistently high across all models, with no significant effects of day, time, or AI model. Guideline-based prompting substantially improved performance and guideline concordance on open-ended questions. In the guideline-supported condition, DeepSeek achieved a median score of 32, while ChatGPT and Gemini achieved median scores of 30. Without guideline support, median scores decreased to 26, 20, and 23, respectively. All models achieved 100% accuracy on MCQs with guideline support, whereas accuracy ranged from 81.2% to 100% without guideline support. Significant differences between AI models were observed for OEQ scores (p < 0.001). Guideline-based prompting improved guideline concordance and overall performance, particularly for open-ended dental trauma questions. These findings support the use of guideline grounding to enhance the guideline concordance and reliability of LLM-generated responses while emphasizing the continued need for clinician oversight.
Anahtar Kelimeler
- Scopus
- 0
- OpenAlex
- 0
Tam Kayıt
| Alan | Değer | Dil |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.author | Kaşıkçı, Sena | |
| dc.contributor.author | Şirinoğlu, Ebru | |
| dc.contributor.author | Özdemir, Olcay | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2026-10-27T23:47:32.307638808Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2026-10-27T23:47:32.307638808Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2026 | |
| dc.description.abstract | This study evaluated the impact of guideline-based prompting on the performance of large language models (LLMs) in answering dental trauma–related questions. Sixteen multiple-choice questions (MCQs) and sixteen open-ended questions (OEQs) derived from the International Association of Dental Traumatology (IADT) guidelines were used. ChatGPT-4o, Gemini-2.5 Flash, and DeepSeek v3.2 were tested under two conditions: with and without guideline support. Questions were asked three times daily over three consecutive days using independent chat sessions. In the guideline-based condition, the dental trauma guideline was uploaded and models were instructed to answer according to the document. Responses were evaluated using predefined answer keys and a structured rubric. Statistical analyses were performed using the Shapiro–Wilk test, aligned rank transform (ART) analysis, and Bonferroni-adjusted multiple comparisons. Multiple-choice performance was consistently high across all models, with no significant effects of day, time, or AI model. Guideline-based prompting substantially improved performance and guideline concordance on open-ended questions. In the guideline-supported condition, DeepSeek achieved a median score of 32, while ChatGPT and Gemini achieved median scores of 30. Without guideline support, median scores decreased to 26, 20, and 23, respectively. All models achieved 100% accuracy on MCQs with guideline support, whereas accuracy ranged from 81.2% to 100% without guideline support. Significant differences between AI models were observed for OEQ scores (p < 0.001). Guideline-based prompting improved guideline concordance and overall performance, particularly for open-ended dental trauma questions. These findings support the use of guideline grounding to enhance the guideline concordance and reliability of LLM-generated responses while emphasizing the continued need for clinician oversight. | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1007/s10266-026-01511-3 | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 1618-1247 | |
| dc.identifier.pmid | 42547726 | |
| dc.identifier.scopus | 2-s2.0-105046486771 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/kostu/10438 | |
| dc.language.iso | en | |
| dc.publisher | Springer | |
| dc.relation.ispartof | Odontology | |
| dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess | |
| dc.subject | Artificial intelligence | |
| dc.subject | Dental trauma | |
| dc.subject | Guideline-based prompting | |
| dc.subject | IADT guidelines | |
| dc.subject | Large language models | |
| dc.title | Impact of guideline-based prompting on the large language model performance in dental trauma management clinical decision-making | |
| dc.type | Article | |
| rdl.citation.openalex | 0 | |
| rdl.citation.scopus | 0 | |
| rdl.department | Department of Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Kocaeli University, 41190, Kocaeli, Turkey | |
| rdl.department | Department of Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Kocaeli Health and Technology University, 41190, Kocaeli, Turkey | |
| rdl.department | Department of Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Karabük University, 78050, Karabük, Turkey | |
| rdl.oa.status | closed | |
| rdl.publication.status | inPress | |
| rdl.scopus.quartile | Q1 | |
| rdl.sdg | SDG03 | |
| rdl.source.index | SCOPUS | |
| rdl.source.index | PUBMED |

