Sürdürülebilir Kalkınma Amaçları

• 3
• 2
• 1

• MakaleAçık Erişim2025Scopus SJRQ1/r/kostu/10638
  Psychometrics of the Attitude Scale towards the use of Artificial Intelligence Technologies in Nursing

  Yılmaz, Dilek; Uzelli, Derya; Dikmen, Yurdanur

  Background: It is clear that nursing practice is directly affected by artificial intelligence (AI), and in this regard, a need is felt for more information on the knowledge and attitudes of nurses to the use of AI technology in nursing care practice. However, no inclusive measurement instrument tested for validity and reliability evaluating the attitudes of nurses to the use of AI technology was found. The aim of this research was to develop and test the validity of the Attitude Scale Towards the Use of Artificial Intelligence Technologies in Nursing (ASUAITIN) in the Turkish language. Methods: The research was a methodological and cross-sectional study, designed to develop and test the validity of the ASUAITIN. STROBE guidelines were followed in the study. In order to create the starting materials, the researchers made a scan of the literature. Two hundred nurses working in the internal medicine, surgical and intensive care departments of a university hospital in the Marmara Region of Turkey were included in the study. Items were assessed for content validity. ASUAITIN was tested for construct validity and internal consistency reliability. Results: ASUAITIN consists of 15 items. It has two dimensions, positive attitude, and negative attitude to AI technology in nursing practice, and practice and explains 67.762% of total variance. Item loads were between 0.529 and 0.866. Cronbach alpha values were calculated to be 0.910 for the total scale, 0.933 for Factor 1, and 0.917 for Factor 2. Conclusions: The results of this study show that the ASUAITIN scale are validated and reliable measurement tool. ASUAITIN can be used as an instrument to assess the attitudes to AI technology in practice among nurses working in the clinical field. Clinical trial number: Not applicable.

  • 
  AtıfScopus34·WoS34·OpenAlex36

  İncele
• MakaleAçık Erişim2025Scopus SJRQ1/r/kostu/10450
  Impact of moulage-based simulation on nursing students’ recognition of physical violence: a randomised controlled trial

  Uysal Yalçın, Suna; Akkoç, Mehtap; Ozdemir, Tuğba; Dikmen, Yurdanur; Türkay, Merve Zehra; Özpancar Şolpan, Nurhan

  Background: Violence against women is a global public health and human rights issue with profound physical and psychological consequences. Simulation-based learning may help nursing students recognize signs of violence. This study examined whether physical violence indicators created on a standardized patient using moulage improve nursing students’ recognition of violence and their related attitudes, knowledge, satisfaction, self-efficacy, and communication skills. Methods: A randomized controlled pretest–posttest design was conducted with 55 fourth-year nursing students allocated to a moulage group (n = 28) and a control group (n = 27). The data collection tools included the “Demographic Information Form”, “ISKEBE Attitude Scale for Violence Against Women,” “Communication Skills Assessment Form”, “Nurses’ and Midwives’ Recognition of Signs of Violence Against Women Form”, “Modified Simulation Effectiveness Tool”, “Student Satisfaction and Self-Efficacy Scale in Learning,” and “Moulage Evaluation Questionnaire.” Data analysis involved calculating frequency, mean, standard deviation, chi-square tests, the Mann-Whitney U test, and the Wilcoxon Signed Ranks Test. Results: The demographic data of the moulage and control groups were similar. Recognition of violence indicators was significantly higher in the moulage group (19.75 ± 2.78) than in the control group (16.38 ± 3.63; p < 0.05). The communication skills of the students in the moulage group had an average score of 5.35 ± 0.48 for the effective communication subscale, while the average score for the therapeutic communication subscale was 4.55 ± 2.91. Additionally, the moulage group reported greater satisfaction with current learning (51.85 ± 6.66) and higher self-efficacy (29.21 ± 4.26, p = 0.006) than the control group. The mean Modified simulation effectiveness tool score was 68.42 ± 20.87, indicating a positive perception of learning effectiveness. No significant between-group difference was found for attitudes (ISKEBE). Conclusion: Moulage-supported simulation enhanced recognition of physical violence indicators, satisfaction, self-efficacy, and communication-related outcomes. The integration of these methods is recommended in future educational programs. Clinical registration: The study is registered on ClinicalTrials.gov. ID: NCT06982017 (date: 2024-05-20).

  • 
  • 
  • 
  AtıfScopus1·WoS1·OpenAlex1

  İncele
• MakaleAçık Erişim2025Scopus SJRQ1/r/kostu/10440
  Adaptation of the incivility in nursing education-revised survey: a validity and reliability study

  Konuk, Tuğba Gözütok; Kural, Şerife Kurşun; Dikmenc, Yurdanur

  Background: Academic incivility is one of the most significant issues that disrupt the learning process for nursing students and adversely affects the quality of nursing care. Therefore, it is crucial to assess incivility within the nursing academic environment using valid and reliable measurement tools. The aim of this study is to translate and adapt the Incivility in Nursing Education-Revised (INE-R) Survey into Turkish and assess its validity and reliability for nursing students and faculty. Methods: The cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the INE-R were carried out within the framework of a methodological cross-sectional study. The Turkish validity and reliability of the INE-R survey, which assesses the behaviors of faculty incivility, were examined with 522 nursing students from 11 different universities, including students from the 2nd, 3rd, 4th year. Data were collected from April 20, 2021 to October 30, 2021. Results: Following the cross-cultural adaptation, the confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) confirmed that the Turkish version of the INE-R, with 24 items and a two-factor structure, showed a good fit. The reliability analysis revealed Cronbach’s alpha of 0.952 for the total score, 0.899 for the low-level incivility subscale, and 0.991 for the high-level incivility subscale. Item analysis indicated that all items had item-total correlation values above 0.30, with none removed. Additionally, removing any item did not improve the scale’s Cronbach’s alpha. The test-retest results showed no statistically significant differences. Conclusion: The Turkish adaptation of the INE-R demonstrates its validity and reliability as a valuable instrument for assessing the perceptions of Turkish nursing students regarding uncivil faculty behaviors, as well as the frequency of their exposure to such behaviors. Impact statement: INE-R survey has demonstrated psychometric reliability and validity, making it a valuable tool for assessing incivility within nursing academia.

  • 
  • 
  AtıfScopus1·WoS2·OpenAlex1

  İncele