Adaptation of the incivility in nursing education-revised survey: a validity and reliability study

MakaleAçık ErişimScopus SJRQ1
  • SDG 3 · Sağlık ve Kaliteli Yaşam
  • SDG 4 · Nitelikli Eğitim

Özet

Background: Academic incivility is one of the most significant issues that disrupt the learning process for nursing students and adversely affects the quality of nursing care. Therefore, it is crucial to assess incivility within the nursing academic environment using valid and reliable measurement tools. The aim of this study is to translate and adapt the Incivility in Nursing Education-Revised (INE-R) Survey into Turkish and assess its validity and reliability for nursing students and faculty. Methods: The cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the INE-R were carried out within the framework of a methodological cross-sectional study. The Turkish validity and reliability of the INE-R survey, which assesses the behaviors of faculty incivility, were examined with 522 nursing students from 11 different universities, including students from the 2nd, 3rd, 4th year. Data were collected from April 20, 2021 to October 30, 2021. Results: Following the cross-cultural adaptation, the confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) confirmed that the Turkish version of the INE-R, with 24 items and a two-factor structure, showed a good fit. The reliability analysis revealed Cronbach’s alpha of 0.952 for the total score, 0.899 for the low-level incivility subscale, and 0.991 for the high-level incivility subscale. Item analysis indicated that all items had item-total correlation values above 0.30, with none removed. Additionally, removing any item did not improve the scale’s Cronbach’s alpha. The test-retest results showed no statistically significant differences. Conclusion: The Turkish adaptation of the INE-R demonstrates its validity and reliability as a valuable instrument for assessing the perceptions of Turkish nursing students regarding uncivil faculty behaviors, as well as the frequency of their exposure to such behaviors. Impact statement: INE-R survey has demonstrated psychometric reliability and validity, making it a valuable tool for assessing incivility within nursing academia.

Anahtar Kelimeler

RDL Kalıcı Bağlantı (PID)
https://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/kostu/10440Resmi atıflarda kullanılan kalıcı adres
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-025-03132-7Yayıncı resmi DOI adresi
İndeks kayıtları
Kaydın indeks veri tabanlarındaki sayfası (aktarımda alınan kayıt numarasıyla). Erişim, indeksin kendi koşullarına bağlıdır.
Atıflar
Scopus
1
WoS
2
OpenAlex
1
Her kaynağın kendi saydığı toplam atıf; aktarım ve zenginleştirme sırasında alındı.
Tam Kayıt
AlanDeğerDil
dc.contributor.authorKonuk, Tuğba Gözütok
dc.contributor.authorKural, Şerife Kurşun
dc.contributor.authorDikmenc, Yurdanur
dc.date.accessioned2026-10-27T23:47:32.380847084Z
dc.date.available2026-10-27T23:47:32.380847084Z
dc.date.issued2025
dc.description.abstractBackground: Academic incivility is one of the most significant issues that disrupt the learning process for nursing students and adversely affects the quality of nursing care. Therefore, it is crucial to assess incivility within the nursing academic environment using valid and reliable measurement tools. The aim of this study is to translate and adapt the Incivility in Nursing Education-Revised (INE-R) Survey into Turkish and assess its validity and reliability for nursing students and faculty. Methods: The cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the INE-R were carried out within the framework of a methodological cross-sectional study. The Turkish validity and reliability of the INE-R survey, which assesses the behaviors of faculty incivility, were examined with 522 nursing students from 11 different universities, including students from the 2nd, 3rd, 4th year. Data were collected from April 20, 2021 to October 30, 2021. Results: Following the cross-cultural adaptation, the confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) confirmed that the Turkish version of the INE-R, with 24 items and a two-factor structure, showed a good fit. The reliability analysis revealed Cronbach’s alpha of 0.952 for the total score, 0.899 for the low-level incivility subscale, and 0.991 for the high-level incivility subscale. Item analysis indicated that all items had item-total correlation values above 0.30, with none removed. Additionally, removing any item did not improve the scale’s Cronbach’s alpha. The test-retest results showed no statistically significant differences. Conclusion: The Turkish adaptation of the INE-R demonstrates its validity and reliability as a valuable instrument for assessing the perceptions of Turkish nursing students regarding uncivil faculty behaviors, as well as the frequency of their exposure to such behaviors. Impact statement: INE-R survey has demonstrated psychometric reliability and validity, making it a valuable tool for assessing incivility within nursing academia.
dc.identifier.articlenumber502
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s12912-025-03132-7
dc.identifier.issn1472-6955
dc.identifier.issue1
dc.identifier.pmcidPMC12063431
dc.identifier.pmid40340845
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-105004444303
dc.identifier.urihttps://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/kostu/10440
dc.identifier.volume24
dc.identifier.wosWOS:001485092900005
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherBioMed Central Ltd
dc.relation.ispartofBMC Nursing
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subjectIncivility
dc.subjectNursing education
dc.subjectNursing students
dc.subjectPsychometric testing
dc.subjectUncivil behavior
dc.subjectValidity and reliability
dc.subject.classificationNursing
dc.titleAdaptation of the incivility in nursing education-revised survey: a validity and reliability study
dc.typeArticle
rdl.citation.openalex1
rdl.citation.scopus1
rdl.citation.wos2
rdl.departmentFaculty of Nursing, Selcuk University, Konya, Turkey
rdl.departmentDepartment of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, Alanya Alaaddin Keykubat University, Antalya, Turkey
rdl.departmentDepartment of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, Kocaeli Health and Technology University, Kocaeli, Turkey
rdl.oa.statusgold
rdl.oa.statusgreen
rdl.oa.urlhttps://bmcnurs.biomedcentral.com/counter/pdf/10.1186/s12912-025-03132-7.pdf
rdl.scopus.quartileQ1
rdl.sdgSDG04
rdl.sdgSDG03
rdl.source.indexSCOPUS
rdl.source.indexWOS
rdl.source.indexPUBMED
rdl.wos.indexScience Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
rdl.wos.indexSocial Science Citation Index (SSCI)