Cognitive-level analysis of dentomaxillofacial radiology questions in the Turkish dentistry specialization examination: a Bloom’s revised taxonomy analysis

MakaleAçık ErişimScopus SJRQ1

Özet

Background: Bloom’s revised taxonomy is widely used to evaluate the cognitive level of examination questions. With the growing use of large language models (LLMs), interest has increased in their potential to support cognitive classification. However, evidence comparing LLM-based classification with expert consensus in dental specialty examinations remains limited. This study aimed to analyze the cognitive levels of dentomaxillofacial radiology (DMFR) questions in the Turkish Dentistry Specialization Examination (DUS) and to evaluate the agreement between expert consensus and ChatGPT v5.2. Methods: A total of 130 text-based DMFR questions from the DUS were classified according to Bloom’s revised taxonomy using expert consensus and ChatGPT v5.2. Agreement between classifications was assessed using exact agreement and quadratic-weighted Cohen’s kappa. Results: “Analyze” was the most frequent cognitive level in both expert consensus (41.5%) and ChatGPT classification (44.6%), followed by “Remember.” Exact agreement between ChatGPT and expert consensus was 80.0%, with almost perfect ordinal agreement (κw = 0.851; 95% bootstrap CI: 0.769–0.923). Conclusions: ChatGPT v5.2 showed high agreement with expert consensus for Bloom-level classification in this dataset. These findings suggest that LLM-based classification may support Bloom-level mapping as an assistive tool; however, they should be interpreted as preliminary evidence of feasibility rather than practical validation. Expert oversight remains necessary, and further research is needed to assess performance across different models, settings, and educational contexts.

Anahtar Kelimeler

RDL Kalıcı Bağlantı (PID)
https://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/kostu/10499Resmi atıflarda kullanılan kalıcı adres
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-026-08624-9Yayıncı resmi DOI adresi
İndeks kayıtları
Kaydın indeks veri tabanlarındaki sayfası (aktarımda alınan kayıt numarasıyla). Erişim, indeksin kendi koşullarına bağlıdır.
Atıflar
Scopus
0
WoS
0
OpenAlex
0
Her kaynağın kendi saydığı toplam atıf; aktarım ve zenginleştirme sırasında alındı.
Tam Kayıt
AlanDeğerDil
dc.contributor.authorOcbe, Melisa
dc.contributor.authorAkcay, Hulya Cerci
dc.contributor.authorGumru, Birsay
dc.contributor.authorYalcinkaya, Sebnem Ercalik
dc.date.accessioned2026-10-27T23:47:35.399091690Z
dc.date.available2026-10-27T23:47:35.399091690Z
dc.date.issued2026
dc.description.abstractBackground: Bloom’s revised taxonomy is widely used to evaluate the cognitive level of examination questions. With the growing use of large language models (LLMs), interest has increased in their potential to support cognitive classification. However, evidence comparing LLM-based classification with expert consensus in dental specialty examinations remains limited. This study aimed to analyze the cognitive levels of dentomaxillofacial radiology (DMFR) questions in the Turkish Dentistry Specialization Examination (DUS) and to evaluate the agreement between expert consensus and ChatGPT v5.2. Methods: A total of 130 text-based DMFR questions from the DUS were classified according to Bloom’s revised taxonomy using expert consensus and ChatGPT v5.2. Agreement between classifications was assessed using exact agreement and quadratic-weighted Cohen’s kappa. Results: “Analyze” was the most frequent cognitive level in both expert consensus (41.5%) and ChatGPT classification (44.6%), followed by “Remember.” Exact agreement between ChatGPT and expert consensus was 80.0%, with almost perfect ordinal agreement (κw = 0.851; 95% bootstrap CI: 0.769–0.923). Conclusions: ChatGPT v5.2 showed high agreement with expert consensus for Bloom-level classification in this dataset. These findings suggest that LLM-based classification may support Bloom-level mapping as an assistive tool; however, they should be interpreted as preliminary evidence of feasibility rather than practical validation. Expert oversight remains necessary, and further research is needed to assess performance across different models, settings, and educational contexts.
dc.identifier.articlenumber1563
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s12903-026-08624-9
dc.identifier.issn1472-6831
dc.identifier.issue1
dc.identifier.pmcidPMC13504794
dc.identifier.pmid42168948
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-105048216010
dc.identifier.urihttps://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/kostu/10499
dc.identifier.volume26
dc.identifier.wosWOS:001857449900002
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherBioMed Central Ltd
dc.relation.ispartofBMC Oral Health
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subjectBloom’s revised taxonomy
dc.subjectCognitive demand
dc.subjectCurriculum alignment
dc.subjectDentistry specialization examination
dc.subjectDentomaxillofacial radiology
dc.subjectLarge language models
dc.subjectMultiple-choice questions
dc.subject.classificationDentistry, Oral Surgery & Medicine
dc.subject.otherCognition
dc.subject.otherConsensus
dc.subject.otherEducation, Dental
dc.subject.otherEducational Measurement
dc.subject.otherHumans
dc.subject.otherLarge Language Models
dc.subject.otherRadiology
dc.subject.otherTurkey
dc.subject.otherdental education
dc.subject.othereducation
dc.subject.otherhuman
dc.subject.otherlarge language model
dc.subject.otherprocedures
dc.subject.otherturkey (bird)
dc.titleCognitive-level analysis of dentomaxillofacial radiology questions in the Turkish dentistry specialization examination: a Bloom’s revised taxonomy analysis
dc.typeArticle
rdl.citation.openalex0
rdl.citation.scopus0
rdl.citation.wos0
rdl.departmentDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Faculty of Dentistry, Kocaeli Health and Technology University, Kocaeli, Türkiye
rdl.departmentDepartment of Pedodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Kocaeli Health and Technology University, Kocaeli, Türkiye
rdl.departmentDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Faculty of Dentistry, Marmara University, Basibuyuk Mah. Basibuyuk Yolu Sok. No: 9/3, Basibuyuk-Maltepe, Istanbul, 34854, Türkiye
rdl.oa.statusgold
rdl.oa.statusgreen
rdl.oa.urlhttps://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-026-08624-9
rdl.scopus.quartileQ1
rdl.source.indexSCOPUS
rdl.source.indexWOS
rdl.source.indexPUBMED
rdl.wos.indexScience Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)