An underrecognized aspect of oncology care: temporomandibular joint evaluation in patients with head and neck cancer

MakaleAçık Erişim
  • SDG 3 · Sağlık ve Kaliteli Yaşam

Özet

Aims: This study aimed to evaluate and compare temporomandibular joint (TMJ) disc position and condylar morphology on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and computed tomography (CT) images of patients with head and neck cancer (HNC) and healthy controls, to determine the prevalence and coexistence of soft-tissue and osseous alterations and to explore their potential clinical relevance. Methods: In this retrospective case-control study, 145 HNC patients and 147 controls that underwent standardized maxillofacial CT and MRI. Anterior disc displacement (ADD) was defined on mid-sagittal MRI; condylar morphology (normal, flattening, erosion, osteophyte) was classified on sagittal CT. Results: Two hundred ninety-two individuals were analyzed (HNC 49.7%). Age was similar (mean difference -3.11 years; p=0.097; Mann-Whitney p=0.0737). ADD prevalence was higher in HNC: right 49.0% vs 37.4% (RD +11.6 percentage points [pp]; RR 1.31; χ² p=0.046), left 52.4% vs 32.7% (RD +19.8 pp; RR 1.61; χ² p=0.00064), and any ADD 60.7% vs 46.9% (RD +13.8 pp; RR 1.29; χ² p=0.018); significance was retained after Holm–Bonferroni adjustment. Condylar morphology distributions differed on both sides (right χ² p=9.6×10-⁵; left p=8.1×10-¹⁰), driven by more erosion in HNC (right 26.9% vs 11.6%; left 27.6% vs 13.6%). “Any condylar pathology” was more frequent in HNC (93.8% vs 85.7%; RD +8.1 pp; OR 2.52; χ² p=0.023; Fisher p=0.033). ADD showed no lateral preference within groups (McNemar p>0.30). Controls, but not HNC patients, exhibited right-greater-than-left discordance for “any condylar pathology” (McNemar p=2.5×10-⁵ vs 1.000). Conclusion: HNC is associated with a high burden of TMJ abnormalities; particularly ADD and an erosive change in condyle; consistent with treatment- and disease-related vulnerability of joint tissues. Providing TMJ assessment into HNC imaging, coupled with early jaw-mobilization and masticatory-muscle–sparing strategies, may help preserve function.

Anahtar Kelimeler

RDL Kalıcı Bağlantı (PID)
https://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/kostu/10877Resmi atıflarda kullanılan kalıcı adres
DOI
https://doi.org/10.32322/jhsm.1785306Yayıncı resmi DOI adresi
İndeks kayıtları
Kaydın indeks veri tabanlarındaki sayfası (aktarımda alınan kayıt numarasıyla). Erişim, indeksin kendi koşullarına bağlıdır.
Atıflar
OpenAlex
0
TR Dizin
0
Her kaynağın kendi saydığı toplam atıf; aktarım ve zenginleştirme sırasında alındı.
Tam Kayıt
AlanDeğerDil
dc.contributor.authorMedişoğlu, M.Sabri
dc.contributor.authorÖçbe, Melisa
dc.contributor.authorÖçbe, Çetin Batuhan
dc.date.accessioned2026-10-27T23:48:56.284085122Z
dc.date.available2026-10-27T23:48:56.284085122Z
dc.date.issued2025
dc.description.abstractAims: This study aimed to evaluate and compare temporomandibular joint (TMJ) disc position and condylar morphology on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and computed tomography (CT) images of patients with head and neck cancer (HNC) and healthy controls, to determine the prevalence and coexistence of soft-tissue and osseous alterations and to explore their potential clinical relevance. Methods: In this retrospective case-control study, 145 HNC patients and 147 controls that underwent standardized maxillofacial CT and MRI. Anterior disc displacement (ADD) was defined on mid-sagittal MRI; condylar morphology (normal, flattening, erosion, osteophyte) was classified on sagittal CT. Results: Two hundred ninety-two individuals were analyzed (HNC 49.7%). Age was similar (mean difference -3.11 years; p=0.097; Mann-Whitney p=0.0737). ADD prevalence was higher in HNC: right 49.0% vs 37.4% (RD +11.6 percentage points [pp]; RR 1.31; χ² p=0.046), left 52.4% vs 32.7% (RD +19.8 pp; RR 1.61; χ² p=0.00064), and any ADD 60.7% vs 46.9% (RD +13.8 pp; RR 1.29; χ² p=0.018); significance was retained after Holm–Bonferroni adjustment. Condylar morphology distributions differed on both sides (right χ² p=9.6×10-⁵; left p=8.1×10-¹⁰), driven by more erosion in HNC (right 26.9% vs 11.6%; left 27.6% vs 13.6%). “Any condylar pathology” was more frequent in HNC (93.8% vs 85.7%; RD +8.1 pp; OR 2.52; χ² p=0.023; Fisher p=0.033). ADD showed no lateral preference within groups (McNemar p>0.30). Controls, but not HNC patients, exhibited right-greater-than-left discordance for “any condylar pathology” (McNemar p=2.5×10-⁵ vs 1.000). Conclusion: HNC is associated with a high burden of TMJ abnormalities; particularly ADD and an erosive change in condyle; consistent with treatment- and disease-related vulnerability of joint tissues. Providing TMJ assessment into HNC imaging, coupled with early jaw-mobilization and masticatory-muscle–sparing strategies, may help preserve function.
dc.identifier.doi10.32322/jhsm.1785306
dc.identifier.eissn2636-8579
dc.identifier.endpage1048
dc.identifier.issue6
dc.identifier.startpage1043
dc.identifier.urihttps://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/kostu/10877
dc.identifier.volume8
dc.language.isoen
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of health sciences and medicine (Online)
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subjectDiş Hekimliği
dc.subjectOnkoloji
dc.subjectRadyoloji, Nükleer Tıp, Tıbbi Görüntüleme
dc.titleAn underrecognized aspect of oncology care: temporomandibular joint evaluation in patients with head and neck cancer
dc.typeArticle
rdl.citation.openalex0
rdl.citation.trdizin0
rdl.oa.statusgold
rdl.oa.urlhttps://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/5247391
rdl.sdgSDG03
rdl.source.indexTRDIZIN