Immersive virtual reality vs. traditional instruction for short-term learning and follow-up outcomes in the Bobath concept: a randomized controlled trial
Özet
Background: Although virtual reality has increasingly been incorporated into health professions education, its effectiveness for teaching structured neurorehabilitation frameworks within physiotherapy remains insufficiently explored. Purpose: This study aimed to compare immersive virtual reality–based instruction with traditional education by evaluating theoretical knowledge and practical skills at short-term (2 days) and follow-up (2 weeks) assessments following Bobath concept instruction among physiotherapy students. Methods: In this assessor-blinded randomized controlled trial, 20 third-year physiotherapy students (mean age: 21.3 ± 1.1 years) were randomly assigned to immersive virtual reality–based instruction or traditional instruction. Both groups received standardized 45-minute training on postural control strategies within the Bobath concept. Learning outcomes were assessed using a multiple-choice theoretical test and a practical examination at 2 days (short-term) and 2 weeks (follow-up) after instruction. Results: Both groups showed a decrease in theoretical scores from the short-term to the follow-up assessment, with no significant between-group difference in change scores (p = 0.817). In contrast, between-group comparison of practical change scores showed a significant difference favoring the virtual reality group (p = 0.017, r = 0.54), with a median difference of + 15 points (95% CI: +5 to + 30). Within-group analyses indicated a significant decline in the traditional instruction group (p = 0.011, r = 0.81), whereas no significant change was observed in the virtual reality group (p = 0.666, r = 0.14). Practical scores increased by approximately 3% in the virtual reality group but decreased by 17% in the traditional instruction group from short-term to follow-up assessment. Conclusion: These findings suggest that immersive virtual reality may support the preservation of practical performance over time in physiotherapy education and may represent a promising instructional approach for teaching complex neurorehabilitation skills. Clinical trial number: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT07270107 (retrospectively registered on December 8, 2025).
Anahtar Kelimeler
- Scopus
- 0
- WoS
- 0
- OpenAlex
- 0
Tam Kayıt
| Alan | Değer | Dil |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.author | Cinarli, Sena | |
| dc.contributor.author | Aydogan, Gamze | |
| dc.contributor.author | Sever, Ebru | |
| dc.contributor.author | Gulcelik, Gönül Ertunc | |
| dc.contributor.author | Atmaca, Halil | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2026-10-27T23:47:44.161181276Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2026-10-27T23:47:44.161181276Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2026 | |
| dc.description.abstract | Background: Although virtual reality has increasingly been incorporated into health professions education, its effectiveness for teaching structured neurorehabilitation frameworks within physiotherapy remains insufficiently explored. Purpose: This study aimed to compare immersive virtual reality–based instruction with traditional education by evaluating theoretical knowledge and practical skills at short-term (2 days) and follow-up (2 weeks) assessments following Bobath concept instruction among physiotherapy students. Methods: In this assessor-blinded randomized controlled trial, 20 third-year physiotherapy students (mean age: 21.3 ± 1.1 years) were randomly assigned to immersive virtual reality–based instruction or traditional instruction. Both groups received standardized 45-minute training on postural control strategies within the Bobath concept. Learning outcomes were assessed using a multiple-choice theoretical test and a practical examination at 2 days (short-term) and 2 weeks (follow-up) after instruction. Results: Both groups showed a decrease in theoretical scores from the short-term to the follow-up assessment, with no significant between-group difference in change scores (p = 0.817). In contrast, between-group comparison of practical change scores showed a significant difference favoring the virtual reality group (p = 0.017, r = 0.54), with a median difference of + 15 points (95% CI: +5 to + 30). Within-group analyses indicated a significant decline in the traditional instruction group (p = 0.011, r = 0.81), whereas no significant change was observed in the virtual reality group (p = 0.666, r = 0.14). Practical scores increased by approximately 3% in the virtual reality group but decreased by 17% in the traditional instruction group from short-term to follow-up assessment. Conclusion: These findings suggest that immersive virtual reality may support the preservation of practical performance over time in physiotherapy education and may represent a promising instructional approach for teaching complex neurorehabilitation skills. Clinical trial number: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT07270107 (retrospectively registered on December 8, 2025). | |
| dc.description.sponsorship | Scientific Research Projects Coordination Unit of Kocaeli Health and Technology University, (26/11) | |
| dc.identifier.articlenumber | 1341 | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1186/s12909-026-09904-2 | |
| dc.identifier.eissn | 1472-6920 | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 1472-6920 | |
| dc.identifier.issue | 1 | |
| dc.identifier.pmcid | PMC13491771 | |
| dc.identifier.pmid | 42625179 | |
| dc.identifier.scopus | 2-s2.0-105047864939 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/kostu/10683 | |
| dc.identifier.volume | 26 | |
| dc.identifier.wos | WOS:001854723800002 | |
| dc.language.iso | en | |
| dc.publisher | BioMed Central Ltd | |
| dc.relation.ispartof | BMC Medical Education | |
| dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess | |
| dc.subject | Bobath Concept | |
| dc.subject | Clinical skills | |
| dc.subject | Education | |
| dc.subject | Physiotherapy | |
| dc.subject | Virtual reality | |
| dc.subject.classification | Education & Educational Research | |
| dc.subject.classification | Education, Scientific Disciplines | |
| dc.subject.other | Clinical Competence | |
| dc.subject.other | Educational Measurement | |
| dc.subject.other | Female | |
| dc.subject.other | Follow-Up Studies | |
| dc.subject.other | Humans | |
| dc.subject.other | Learning | |
| dc.subject.other | Male | |
| dc.subject.other | Physical Therapy Modalities | |
| dc.subject.other | Physical Therapy Specialty | |
| dc.subject.other | Single-Blind Method | |
| dc.subject.other | Virtual Reality | |
| dc.subject.other | Young Adult | |
| dc.subject.other | adult | |
| dc.subject.other | article | |
| dc.subject.other | control strategy | |
| dc.subject.other | controlled study | |
| dc.subject.other | education | |
| dc.subject.other | follow up | |
| dc.subject.other | human | |
| dc.subject.other | knowledge | |
| dc.subject.other | major clinical study | |
| dc.subject.other | medical profession | |
| dc.subject.other | multiple choice test | |
| dc.subject.other | neurorehabilitation | |
| dc.subject.other | physical therapy student | |
| dc.subject.other | physiotherapy | |
| dc.subject.other | randomized controlled trial | |
| dc.subject.other | skill | |
| dc.subject.other | teaching | |
| dc.subject.other | therapy | |
| dc.subject.other | comparative study | |
| dc.subject.other | single blind procedure | |
| dc.title | Immersive virtual reality vs. traditional instruction for short-term learning and follow-up outcomes in the Bobath concept: a randomized controlled trial | |
| dc.type | Article | |
| rdl.citation.openalex | 0 | |
| rdl.citation.scopus | 0 | |
| rdl.citation.wos | 0 | |
| rdl.department | Department of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation, Kocaeli Health and Technology University, Kocaeli, Turkey | |
| rdl.department | Institute of Health Sciences, Marmara University, Istanbul, Turkey | |
| rdl.department | Institute of Health Sciences, Istanbul Medipol University, Istanbul, Turkey | |
| rdl.department | Orthopedics and Traumatology, Istanbul, Turkey | |
| rdl.oa.status | gold | |
| rdl.oa.status | green | |
| rdl.scopus.quartile | Q1 | |
| rdl.sdg | SDG04 | |
| rdl.sdg | SDG03 | |
| rdl.source.index | SCOPUS | |
| rdl.source.index | WOS | |
| rdl.source.index | PUBMED | |
| rdl.wos.index | Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED) | |
| rdl.wos.index | Social Science Citation Index (SSCI) |


